Healthcare Reform Legislation
Obama Care targets to reduce the increments of cost in the healthcare system. The legislation has impacts on the national expenses and the insurances. The extension of insurances of health promotes an increment in medical expenditures within the short run. In meeting its obligations, the legislation may cause pressures on businesses where retailers and other small businesses are forced to reduce the time allocated for full-time working.
The employers may decide to reduce the working hours to avoid insurance payments. Furthermore, the Congressional Budget Office emphasizes that these hours may be reduced by 1.5% to 2% or an alternate solution of the reduced workforce for businesses concerning low production. In perspective, employers may be forced to pay extra to regain commitments from employees while surpassing full-time employment (1). Otherwise, such businesses must employ a high number of employees to complete various tasks initially tackled by the additional working hours. The idea dictates that a higher cost must be allocated for the cost of human resources, or the businesses must pay the insurance for full-time workers. Probably, the implementation of the legislation will increase the number of jobs in the future.
The legislation will allow the employees to make better salaries for working less or receive extra advantages of insurance at the cost of the employer. The increment of payments brought at the family level boosts the demand for lab physicians and reduce the level of unemployment. Essentially, the devolved income provides opportunities for business growth throughout the economy since the physicians have the capacities to purchase items locally.
The laboratories will demand more materials and equipment to handle the increasing number of clients. They will manage to serve a greater number of patients and collect income from the insurance companies mandated to handle the cost. On the other hand, the tactic ensures that the costs of the health systems reduce their growth pace by employing more physicians and maintaining stationery salaries.
The insurance of employees will enable more people to access health services making the system more productive concerning the patient served and their freedom to access the treatments. It is also apparent that the insurance arouses financial security against poor health where the members can get treatment regardless of their current finances. For instance, people can visit laboratories for checkups at the cost of an employer, which boosts community health and pump money into the health sector
Key Issues with POCT
It is vital to ensure that a credible framework is set up as a reference for POCT. This aspect implies that the health system must record, train, monitor, and analyze all forms of information available in a hospital (1). The accuracy of the test and its outcomes are usually investigated together with other documentation to identify faults. The advances in technology have brought issues regarding preferences and accuracies for various updated equipment while compared to earlier ones.
Essentially, the POCT does not comply with some requirements of traditional models of laboratory investigations since the setups were for different points. Other issues are associated with management where diverse equipment and individuals are controlled to assure quality delivery. The POCT must have a cohesive system of physicians, laboratories, and nurses to create an effective health revolution. These sections ensure that each responsibility is handled properly by the right professionals. The allocation of roles by professionalism guarantees reliability in terms of results’ accuracy and confidence.
Furthermore, POCT must deliver educational and training updates to its workforce to ensure that new knowledge is aligned with the prevailing workforce at all times. It has been deduced that there are differences in the area of professionalism offering distinct compliance tactics between the various branches of the health system. For instance, some POCT members are not involved in laboratory matters, which make them naïve to follow procedures and ensure explicit quality and compliance. Another issue is the differences in education and experience. The connection of ideas and information can be introduced to the health system via computer technology to combine entries and make communication between the parties efficient.
Harmening, DN. Laboratory Management: Principles and Processes. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg, Fla.: D.H. Pub & Consulting; 2013.