The present work is necessary for the review of contemporary medication error research, as it directly addresses the nature of this phenomenon, discussing the consequences of incorrect medicine application by trained nurses. The article allows gathering needed information on the topic of nurse qualifications and their impact on incorrect medicine application rates. To ensure the patients’ safety during the experiment, the scholars informed every individual of the need to sign a consent form. Moreover, the project was revised and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Health Network.
This study aimed to evaluate nurse interventions’ potential effectiveness in decreasing medication error rates and examine the consequences of such interventions in detail. Additionally, the researchers sought to improve the nursing personnel’s abilities to administer correct prescriptions. An experimental quantitative method design was implemented to achieve these goals, with personal interviews with all participants. The general methodology relied on gathering preliminary drug administration data, constructing credible nursing interventions, conducting the devised strategies, and evaluating their efficacy.
The research methods applied in the investigation discussed appear to be exceptionally detailed, considering the primary ward environment and the nursing personnel’s abilities. This study’s remarkable strength is its duration, which allowed the scholars to thoroughly examine the current nurses’ knowledge and devise an intervention approach that would be most beneficial for the circumstances. The findings are highly credible, as the hypothesis was based on a solid theoretical basis (Cypress, 2017). The questionnaires used were proven to be valid and reliable by previous research.
The impact of medicine application mistakes can be especially harmful when intensive care units are involved, as their patients are more susceptible to adverse outcomes of incorrect drug implementations. To prevent the aforementioned errors, it is imperative to outline the potential threats presented by the lack of necessary professional information. The authors investigated consideration of the ethical postulates, informing all of the patients of the deliberate nature of participation and attaining approval from the clinical research Ethics Committee at the General Hospital of Valencia.
This research’s primary aims were to identify the medication administration faults that are conducted by nurses in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and to determine the impact of the degree of the nursing personnel’s professional knowledge on medicine errors. The methods utilized were mixed, as both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. The methodology included collecting quantitative data from patient medical records and questionnaires, while the qualitative data was obtained during individual interviews with the participants.
The practical strength of this research is its masterful implementation of both qualitative and quantitative information. The scholars explore a tremendous quantity of patient data, administering both interviews and post-hoc observations, simultaneously consulting outside medical professionals. The knowledge gathered is especially reliable as an extensive theoretical background is present, and the questionnaires utilized were previously investigated on the subject of validity (Farghaly, 2018). Therefore, it is clear that the article provides a trustworthy analysis of the problem.
The article presented examines the consequences of the inaccurate application of medicine on patient safety, addressing electronic health systems’ issues. Reviewing the origins of medicinal errors demands a detailed exploration of the techniques used to prescribe and administer specific drugs and doses, as well as ascertaining if the technological approaches mentioned are at all successful for this purpose. The scholars adhere to research ethics, stating that the participants signed a consent form and were knowledgeable of the further use of attained data.
The aims of the study envelope examining access to patient records and medicine prescribed, and evaluating the influence of search access on future medication errors. Qualitative methods were employed to interview 56 professionals working with electronic health systems, and the primary themes from the conversations were highlighted and further analyzed. The methodology consisted of selecting health representatives who often interact with the system in question and exploring their experience with it.
The present article’s value is exceptional, as it allows for inspecting medical professionals’ beliefs and behaviors in connection to electronic health systems. The authors thoroughly describe both the complications and the advantages of this technology from its direct users’ viewpoint. It appears that the study can be considered reliable, as a sufficient number of participants was present, and a suitable methodology was used (Farghaly, 2018). However, it is not clear if the scholars used a valid questioning approach, which undermines the study’s credibility.
The current work is highly beneficial for the discussion of medication errors is it investigates the process of reporting and identifying committed mistakes and emphasizes the need to consider clinicians’ decision-making. Understanding the roots of medical faults demands clarifying the correlations between the individual responsible and the barriers that might be constraining them from admitting potential errors. The researchers reviewed the ethical considerations, obtained participants’ consent, and were granted approval from the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Hospital.
The general goal of the investigation was to define the personal and organizational features that can be useful in decreasing the factors impeding the nurses’ reports of incorrectly administered medications. The design used was cross-sectional and descriptive, with the implementation of quantitative data regarding nursing personnel’s knowledge and perceived barriers to reporting medicine administration errors. The information was obtained using questionnaires and interviewing methods, and the overall methodology consisted of measuring the canonical variables and analyzing the acquired data.
The article discussed is exceptionally significant as it employs multiple research factors at once, evaluating the connection between the nursing team’s attitudes and the health care institution’s policies. Moreover, the authors consider both social and environmental conditions and cautiously examined the information obtained using sufficient analysis methods (Farghaly, 2018). The questionnaires implemented were previously supported by other research, stating their reliability and credibility.
Farghaly, A. (2018). Comparing and contrasting quantitative and qualitative research approaches in education: The peculiar situation of medical education. Education in Medicine Journal, 10(1), 3–11. Web.
Cypress, B. S. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(4), 253-263. Web.